Engagement summary
The invoice team ran accounts payable (AP) processing for an anonymized global logistics and freight company with 1,200+ carriers.
- Delivery model
- Managed operations team
- Client Segment
- Global Logistics & Freight Leader (1,200+ carriers)
- Core Systems Intersected
- SAP S/4HANA, Coupa, Actigy BPO LedgerSync
- Scope delivered
- Invoice intake, three-way matching, exception handling and draft payment batches
The challenge: high-volume AP for a global logistics company
Unstructured, multi-language invoice formats from 1,200+ carriers overwhelmed a multinational freight provider. Manual entry caused keying errors, duplicate payouts and missed early-payment discounts.
Workflow and monthly volume
The invoice team took over end-to-end execution of the procure-to-pay pipeline from a delivery team in Romania.
Process volume
The team handled these monthly volumes:
- Invoices: 35,000+ complex, multi-page vendor bills per month
- Line-item exceptions: 6,000+ resolved per month
- Vendor payouts: $42M+ in monthly B2B payouts
Team
- Dedicated delivery team: 1 accounts payable delivery lead, 2 escalation managers and 14 transactional processing associates
Workflow
The team ran four workflow steps:
- Omnichannel document intake: Centralized capture across email, EDI, and vendor portals
- Intelligent document parsing: OCR-driven extraction from unstructured, multi-language PDFs
- Automated three-way matching: Line items verified against POs and receiving logs
- Exception remediation: Discrepancies resolved directly with carriers
Quality assurance model
The team ran the Actigy BPO Statistical Sampling Matrix (ASSM). High-value files and files without a purchase order (non-PO) triggered mandatory human review. Recurring invoices went through a randomized 15% end-of-day quality audit.
- Mandatory review: High-value and non-PO invoices
- Sampling audit: Randomized 15% of recurring invoices, end of day
Tools
- Client stack: SAP S/4HANA, Coupa
- Proprietary infrastructure: Actigy BPO LedgerSync (proprietary multi-model large language model, or LLM, middleware)
What stayed with the client
The client kept full treasury ownership and banking custody. The delivery team held zero disbursement authority. The team staged all payments as “Draft Batches” that required client release.
Results
The figures below describe this anonymized engagement, not a forecast for another scope.
| Operational Metric | Legacy State | Engagement outcome | Performance Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Per Invoice Processed | $12.40 | $3.10 | 75% Cost Reduction |
| Invoice Lifecycle (Intake to Pay) | 14 Business Days | 48 Hours | Reported durations; business-day and hour bases differ |
| Three-Way Match Rate | 34% (Manual Heavy) | 92% | +58 percentage points in three-way matching |
| Touchless line-item matching | Not stated | 75% | Separate from the three-way match rate |
Additional before-and-after key performance indicators (KPIs) (Actigy BPO-reported):
- Early payment capture rate: The invoice team raised early payment capture from 12% to 98.4%, saving $640K a year.
- Data entry precision: The team lifted data entry precision to 99.95%.
- Vendor late-payment holds: The workflow eliminated vendor late-payment holds.
How the pilot worked
The delivery lead scaled volume only after the pilot proved quality and throughput.
Timeline to pilot
11 days to map configurations, test APIs and pilot 2,000 invoices.
Timeline to scale
28 days to reach full steady-state global production.
Services used
For a different workload, read the SaaS accounts payable case study. Its invoice volumes, costs and close-cycle measures belong to a separate engagement.
This engagement used accounts payable outsourcing, from invoice intake to three-way matching and exception handling.
For a new freight-support queue, review the logistics BPO scope and client decision boundaries.